Today’s social platforms can instantly convert even the most harrowing news events into misleading tidbits and gleefully empty jokes. By Kyle Chayka
After a gunman attacked Donald Trump during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on Saturday, the first pieces of media to emerge were striking photographs of Trump, with blood trickling down his face, pumping his fist defiantly as Secret Service officers escorted him off the stage. My colleague Benjamin Wallace-Wells described this scene, as captured by Evan Vucci of the Associated Press, as “the indelible image of our era of political crisis and conflict.” (Trump later gloated, “Usually you have to die to have an iconic picture.”) As many have noted, these pictures are the documents of the incident which are presumably destined for the history books. In the present, though, public perception is influenced just as much by how the shooting gets digested and distributed online as countless fragments of viral content. Fittingly, for an event involving a former President notorious for spreading disinformation and inanity online, the assassination attempt on Trump suggests just how rapidly today’s social platforms can distort a deadly serious news event into misleading tidbits and gleefully empty jokes. |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome to "Hawaii Science Journal". Here you'll find the latest stories from science, technology, medicine, and the environment.