"The ancient origins of bioluminescence in animals."
Views expressed in this science and technology update are those of the reporters and correspondents. Accessed on 24 April 2024, 2152 UTC.
Content and Source: https://www.nature.com/nature.rss.
Please scroll down to read your selections. Thanks for joining us today.
Russ Roberts (https://hawaiisciencejournal.blogspot.com).
| ||
| ||
Hello Nature readers, | ||
 | ||
| It’s unclear why animals such as octocorals evolved the ability to glow. Light production could initially have been a byproduct of a biochemical pathway to make antioxidants that only later became useful for communication. (NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research, Deepwater Wonders of Wake) | ||
Glowing evolved 540 million years ago
An ancient group of glowing corals pushes back the origin of bioluminescence in animals to more than half a billion years ago. “We had no idea it was going to be this old,” says evolutionary marine biologist and study co-author Danielle DeLeo. Tiny crustaceans that lived around 270 million years ago were previously thought to be the earliest glowing animals. Genetic analysis and computer modelling revealed that octocorals probably evolved the ability to make light much earlier, around the time when the first animals developed eyes. Nature | 4 min readReference: Proceedings of the Royal Society B paper |
Lethal mpox strain appears to spread via sex
A virulent strain of the monkeypox virus might have gained the ability to spread through sexual contact. The strain, called clade Ib, has caused a cluster of infections in a conflict-ridden region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). This isn’t the first time scientists have warned that the monkeypox virus could become sexually transmissible: similar warnings during a 2017 outbreak in Nigeria were largely ignored. The strain responsible, clade II, is less lethal than clade Ib, but ultimately caused an ongoing global outbreak that has infected more than 94,000 people and killed more than 180. “The DRC is surrounded by nine other countries — we’re playing with fire here,” says virologist Nicaise Ndembi. Nature | 5 min readReference: medRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed) |
WHO redefines airborne transmission
The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed how it classifies airborne pathogens. It has removed the distinction between transmission by smaller virus-containing ‘aerosol’ particles and spread through larger ‘droplets’. The division, which some researchers argue was unscientific, justified WHO’s March 2020 assertion that SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic, was not airborne. Under the new definition, SARS-CoV-2 would be recognized as spreading ‘through the air’ — although some scientists feel this term is less clear than ‘airborne’. “I'm not saying everybody is happy, and not everybody agrees on every word in the document, but at least people have agreed this is a baseline terminology,” says WHO chief scientist Jeremy Farrar. Nature | 6 min readReference: WHO technical report |
Features & opinion
How artificial intelligence is changing war
The development of lethal autonomous weapons, such as AI-equipped drones, is on the rise. “The technical capability for a system to find a human being and kill them is much easier than to develop a self-driving car,” says computer scientist and campaigner against AI weapons Stuart Russell. Some argue that accurate AI weapons could reduce collateral damage while helping vulnerable nations to defend themselves. At the same time, observers are concerned that passing targeting decisions to an algorithm could lead to catastrophic mistakes. The United Nations will discuss AI weapons at a meeting later this year — potentially a first step towards controlling the new threat. Nature | 11 min read |
Climate ruling ‘makes judicial history’
In early April, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favour of a group of more than 2,500 Swiss female activists aged 64 or over who argued that Switzerland was doing too little to protect them as a group particularly vulnerable to health effects stemming from climate change. “This marks the first time that an international human-rights court has linked protection of human rights with duties to mitigate global warming, clarifying once and for all that climate law and policy do not operate in a human-rights vacuum,” says legal scholar Charlotte Blattner, who advised the court. “The ruling is bound to alter the course of climate protection around the world.” Nature | 5 min read |
The forgotten women who tested the pill
When US scientists needed a place to test the first birth-control pill, they looked to Puerto Rico. But many of the working-class women who took the pill were unaware that they were part of a clinical trial. Debilitating side effects were dismissed as psychosomatic. And when the final product came onto the market, it was too expensive for women like them to afford. The play Las Borinqueñas revisits this complicated history. “It’s a long-overdue tribute and, most importantly, a reminder to remain vigilant against abuse and disrespect in studies involving human participants,” writes Nature reporter Mariana Lenharo in her review. Nature | 7 min read |
Image of the week
 | |
| This image, taken on top of the icebreaker research vessel Polarstern, shows the delicate process of retrieving an ocean-monitoring instrument called a CTD (short for conductivity, temperature, depth) that had become trapped under sea ice off the coast of northeastern Greenland. CTDs, which are anchored to the sea floor, measure how properties such as salinity and temperature vary with depth. The photo is the winner of Nature’s 2024 Working Scientist photography competition. See the rest of the winning images from the competition here. (Richard Jones) | |
QUOTE OF THE DAY
| |
 |
ACCESS NATURE AND 54 OTHER NATURE JOURNALS
Nature+ is our most affordable 30-day subscription, giving you online access to a wide range of specialist Nature Portfolio journals, including Nature. Nature+ is for personal use and is suitable for students. | |||||
| |||||
You received this newsletter because you subscribed with the email address: kh6jrm@gmail.com Please add briefing@nature.com to your address book. Enjoying this newsletter? You can use this form to recommend it to a friend or colleague — thank you! Had enough? To unsubscribe from this Briefing, but keep receiving your other Nature Briefing newsletters, please update your subscription preferences. To stop all Nature Briefing emails forever, click here to remove your personal data from our system. Fancy a bit of a read? View our privacy policy. Forwarded by a friend? Get the Briefing straight to your inbox: subscribe for free. Want to master time management, protect your mental health and brush up on your skills? Sign up for our free short e-mail series for working scientists, Back to the lab. Get more from Nature: Register for free on nature.com to sign up for other newsletters specific to your field and email alerts from Nature Portfolio journals. Would you like to read the Briefing in other languages? 关注Nature Portfolio官方微信订阅号，每周二为您推送Nature Briefing精选中文内容——自然每周简报。
Nature Portfolio | The Springer Nature Campus, 4 Crinan Street, London, N1 9XW, United Kingdom Nature Portfolio, part of Springer Nature. |
.png)
